Comments on: Why Foobar2000? http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/ Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:01:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Tasos http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-97693 Tasos Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:22:35 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-97693 I used winamp 2.95 for a long time, after trying newer versions of winamp with FLAC files and found that the OLD winamp with the older FLAC decoder sounds BETTER... dunno why and how! Now I use foobar2000 and I will try to get ASIO working ;) My system: X-Fi Music->NAD C325BEE->B&W 685 speakers I used winamp 2.95 for a long time, after trying newer versions of winamp with FLAC files and found that the OLD winamp with the older FLAC decoder sounds BETTER… dunno why and how!

Now I use foobar2000 and I will try to get ASIO working ;)

My system:
X-Fi Music->NAD C325BEE->B&W 685 speakers

]]> By: olo http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-56813 olo Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:19:31 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-56813 I have tried many and to my ears Foobar2000 IS THE BEST free player. I have tried many and to my ears Foobar2000 IS THE BEST free player.

]]> By: wilco_sg http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-40175 wilco_sg Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:34:53 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-40175 have you tried winamp with MAD decoder, SSRC directsound output with izotope dsp? juz want to know your opinion about MAD and SSRC. thanks! have you tried winamp with MAD decoder, SSRC directsound output with izotope dsp? juz want to know your opinion about MAD and SSRC. thanks!

]]> By: vicong http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-34999 vicong Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:55:22 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-34999 Yes in Windows I love Foobar too even without ASIO support, simplicity is the best :) Yes in Windows I love Foobar too even without ASIO support, simplicity is the best :)

]]> By: Jimmy Auw http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-34842 Jimmy Auw Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:57:06 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-34842 The way it decodes the file... The way it decodes the file…

]]> By: coolkwc http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-34817 coolkwc Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:56:31 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-34817 i had download the foobar and tried but hardly to find any different from my Winamp 5.53....I am using X-FI XtremeMusic and MX5021...maybe you can explain whats the foobar difference from other media player, I really wish to know....thanks i had download the foobar and tried but hardly to find any different from my Winamp 5.53….I am using X-FI XtremeMusic and MX5021…maybe you can explain whats the foobar difference from other media player, I really wish to know….thanks

]]> By: Mike Madison http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30845 Mike Madison Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:55:18 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30845 Hi there, I completely agree with you. This Foobar is absolutely outperforms most player. Greetings from old fellas at 3dss... Hi there,
I completely agree with you. This Foobar is absolutely outperforms most player.
Greetings from old fellas at 3dss…

]]> By: David Winarso http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30830 David Winarso Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:55:42 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30830 Mr. Auw, have you ever try Audacity? Another excellent free s/w... this one is intended for editing actually... I think it is even better then Foobar... The cons is... it has it's own file format... though can import from WAV or MP3. Another cons.. can only one file at a time. Mr. Auw,

have you ever try Audacity? Another excellent free s/w… this one is intended for editing actually…

I think it is even better then Foobar… The cons is… it has it’s own file format… though can import from WAV or MP3. Another cons.. can only one file at a time.

]]> By: Jimmy Auw http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30826 Jimmy Auw Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:37:37 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30826 With a good sound card (I use Lynx L22), Foobar with WaveOut is still better than WinAmp or Windows Media Player. With a good sound card (I use Lynx L22), Foobar with WaveOut is still better than WinAmp or Windows Media Player.

]]> By: r3dx http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30800 r3dx Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:31:03 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/2008/03/04/why-foobar2000/#comment-30800 he3x.. another foobar fanboy huh? :p me too (after trying with the ASIO support.. :D, without it. IMO is the same as Winamp or etc..) he3x.. another foobar fanboy huh? :p

me too (after trying with the ASIO support.. :D, without it. IMO is the same as Winamp or etc..)

]]>