<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LPCD: A New CD Audio Technology from Hugo Productions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-123300</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-123300</guid>
		<description>tolong lagu teresa teng di adakan lagi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tolong lagu teresa teng di adakan lagi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memphisbealegodsey</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-119353</link>
		<dc:creator>memphisbealegodsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-119353</guid>
		<description>I have 16 and 24 track master reel to reel tapes for sale of recordings of Memphis musicians and John Daly. Recorded from 1980s thru 2002. Contact if interested at memphisbeale007@youtube</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 16 and 24 track master reel to reel tapes for sale of recordings of Memphis musicians and John Daly. Recorded from 1980s thru 2002. Contact if interested at memphisbeale007@youtube</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PALUSE</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-119327</link>
		<dc:creator>PALUSE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-119327</guid>
		<description>A lot of this is crap! A new way to do money! CD is about 26 years old, which is the normal time line to get the medium sound very good! The ADCs and DACs are now with top precision, the analog stages are optimized and the mass production techniques have evoluted since 1983! The analog LP pass throught this stages too since the introduction of RIAA equlization and stereo editions!I believe that the first RIAA encoded LP and the first stereo LP dont sound as the best vinyl at the time, it took time too, some 20 to 30 years to get the marriage stable! If you look to the LP production chain you&#039;ll see that is a very fragile media, able to get losses between the various stages until we have the final production media! One thing is certain, a top analog tape studio player, top cables and top ADC with prestine input stages, and of course, clean power supply and thermal stability (Power on and let it be), with good ears and tonal taste to get the digital masters sound at its best is essential, after that if the rest of the chain is trully pro we got excellent cd sound! Its a shame that the SACD is another lonely child from Sony! It seems that copy capability in the masses is a request to comercial success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of this is crap! A new way to do money! CD is about 26 years old, which is the normal time line to get the medium sound very good! The ADCs and DACs are now with top precision, the analog stages are optimized and the mass production techniques have evoluted since 1983! The analog LP pass throught this stages too since the introduction of RIAA equlization and stereo editions!I believe that the first RIAA encoded LP and the first stereo LP dont sound as the best vinyl at the time, it took time too, some 20 to 30 years to get the marriage stable! If you look to the LP production chain you&#8217;ll see that is a very fragile media, able to get losses between the various stages until we have the final production media! One thing is certain, a top analog tape studio player, top cables and top ADC with prestine input stages, and of course, clean power supply and thermal stability (Power on and let it be), with good ears and tonal taste to get the digital masters sound at its best is essential, after that if the rest of the chain is trully pro we got excellent cd sound! Its a shame that the SACD is another lonely child from Sony! It seems that copy capability in the masses is a request to comercial success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-119147</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-119147</guid>
		<description>Tom is right, I have tried many times, I can get all the 1&#039;s and 0&#039;s correct, 100% correct; BUT the timing (the length of the pits and lands) of each &quot;1&quot; and &quot;0&quot; is different, that&#039;s why one needs AMQR capable burners to burn CDRs, which LPCD also uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom is right, I have tried many times, I can get all the 1&#8242;s and 0&#8242;s correct, 100% correct; BUT the timing (the length of the pits and lands) of each &#8220;1&#8243; and &#8220;0&#8243; is different, that&#8217;s why one needs AMQR capable burners to burn CDRs, which LPCD also uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Auw</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-110442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Auw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-110442</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,
You better try yourself and see the result. I&#039;ve been there...
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,<br />
You better try yourself and see the result. I&#8217;ve been there&#8230;<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-110419</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-110419</guid>
		<description>Digital copies are always 1/1.  That&#039;s because there are checksum to correct errors such as a fingerprint.  Those pops you hear on a ripped mp3 is the result of a poor quality rom drive not having a large enough buffer to correct the data in during the rip.  Don&#039;t think of the music on your CD as music, but just data...data just like the word file on your computer.  If you copy that file to a cd and make 1000 copies of the copies, you should still get the same file.  We are not living in the analogue age where copies loses some of the master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital copies are always 1/1.  That&#8217;s because there are checksum to correct errors such as a fingerprint.  Those pops you hear on a ripped mp3 is the result of a poor quality rom drive not having a large enough buffer to correct the data in during the rip.  Don&#8217;t think of the music on your CD as music, but just data&#8230;data just like the word file on your computer.  If you copy that file to a cd and make 1000 copies of the copies, you should still get the same file.  We are not living in the analogue age where copies loses some of the master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlin</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-34712</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-34712</guid>
		<description>So, what can you suggest in this era, the best CD/DVD Drive for ripping audio cd and burning audio cd?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what can you suggest in this era, the best CD/DVD Drive for ripping audio cd and burning audio cd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Auw</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-32247</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Auw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-32247</guid>
		<description>Consider this one...

Your CD is digital. But your laser is analog.
You scratch the surface. Just a small scratch. Are you sure your laser still can read the same bits? Losing 1000 samples from million samples inside your CD Audio won&#039;t hurt, but it&#039;s still not a exact or perfect copy. Have you ever heard the &quot;skipping track&quot; or &quot;high pitch noise&quot; on your MP3 ripped from Audio CD? This simply because of the problem when reading the CD. Some will just ignore and ripped the data. This is audible one.. many of them need extra equipment to be measured.

And finally... You can compare two copied CD with different burner. 
They both can not produce exactly the same result. Many have done comparison for this and some burner like Plextor usually chosen as the best one (on its era).

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider this one&#8230;</p>
<p>Your CD is digital. But your laser is analog.<br />
You scratch the surface. Just a small scratch. Are you sure your laser still can read the same bits? Losing 1000 samples from million samples inside your CD Audio won&#8217;t hurt, but it&#8217;s still not a exact or perfect copy. Have you ever heard the &#8220;skipping track&#8221; or &#8220;high pitch noise&#8221; on your MP3 ripped from Audio CD? This simply because of the problem when reading the CD. Some will just ignore and ripped the data. This is audible one.. many of them need extra equipment to be measured.</p>
<p>And finally&#8230; You can compare two copied CD with different burner.<br />
They both can not produce exactly the same result. Many have done comparison for this and some burner like Plextor usually chosen as the best one (on its era).</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-31914</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-31914</guid>
		<description>.... A simple experiment of duplicating a CD 5 or 6 times on a home computer will prove that the last pressing will sound much inferior to the original CD.

I&#039;m not sure if this is true.  Every Digital Copy should be exactly the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. A simple experiment of duplicating a CD 5 or 6 times on a home computer will prove that the last pressing will sound much inferior to the original CD.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this is true.  Every Digital Copy should be exactly the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy&#8217;s Junkyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LPCD45 Version of Chen Lily (陳潔麗)</title>
		<link>http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/comment-page-1/#comment-16512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy&#8217;s Junkyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LPCD45 Version of Chen Lily (陳潔麗)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyauw.com/2007/05/23/lpcd-a-new-cd-technology-from-hugo-productions/#comment-16512</guid>
		<description>[...] For you who want to know more about LPCD45 can read my article here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For you who want to know more about LPCD45 can read my article here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

