Comments on: Udial Explained http://jimmyauw.com/2007/02/08/udial-explained/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:21:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: XoR http://jimmyauw.com/2007/02/08/udial-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-119304 XoR Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:13:15 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/?p=104#comment-119304 U're testing if udial.wav is good on E-MU 1820? This is just plain retarded... It can damage tweeters but this happen if someone think distortions won't be easily audible. Laser sound are louder than dialing tone, as high frequencies are louder. And it's meant to sound bad on onboard audio codecs and on Live!/Audigy, not on E-MU... My Live! 24-bit sounded good, but onboard audio performance was horrible. It ofcourse can damage tweeters and caution is needed. To hear that "laser sound" volume should be very low as this sound is louder than dialing sound. It habe volume of that ps. Udial will always sound good on Vista/Win7 cause those OSes have much better audio stack with highest quality resamplers. U’re testing if udial.wav is good on E-MU 1820? This is just plain retarded…

It can damage tweeters but this happen if someone think distortions won’t be easily audible. Laser sound are louder than dialing tone, as high frequencies are louder.

And it’s meant to sound bad on onboard audio codecs and on Live!/Audigy, not on E-MU… My Live! 24-bit sounded good, but onboard audio performance was horrible.

It ofcourse can damage tweeters and caution is needed. To hear that “laser sound” volume should be very low as this sound is louder than dialing sound. It habe volume of that

ps. Udial will always sound good on Vista/Win7 cause those OSes have much better audio stack with highest quality resamplers.

]]> By: Octoploid http://jimmyauw.com/2007/02/08/udial-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-119292 Octoploid Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:04:42 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/?p=104#comment-119292 Here is a spectrogram of udial.wav: http://www.mypicx.com/uploadimg/1456787709_02282009_1.png Here is a spectrogram of udial.wav:

http://www.mypicx.com/uploadimg/1456787709_02282009_1.png

]]> By: AstralStorm http://jimmyauw.com/2007/02/08/udial-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-119276 AstralStorm Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:27:04 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/?p=104#comment-119276 Udial is meant to detect bad resamplers, not all of them. It will certainly detect simple linear and cubic interpolation. It can even detect low-quality sinc interpolation libsamplerate can do at low settings. Good quality resamplers don't introduce intermodulation artifacts - Foobar's polyphase resampler (PPHS) is one. Udial is meant to detect bad resamplers, not all of them.
It will certainly detect simple linear and cubic interpolation.
It can even detect low-quality sinc interpolation libsamplerate can do at low settings.
Good quality resamplers don’t introduce intermodulation artifacts – Foobar’s polyphase resampler (PPHS) is one.

]]> By: Jimmy Auw http://jimmyauw.com/2007/02/08/udial-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-35795 Jimmy Auw Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:52:26 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/?p=104#comment-35795 What do you mean? I don't understand what you are talking about? Please explain. Thank you. What do you mean? I don’t understand what you are talking about? Please explain.
Thank you.

]]> By: Willy http://jimmyauw.com/2007/02/08/udial-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-35650 Willy Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:13:34 +0000 http://jimmyauw.com/?p=104#comment-35650 Is there a way to check if there is no incorrect 44.1 > 48 Khz conversion? Is there a way to check if there is no incorrect 44.1 > 48 Khz conversion?

]]>